Principle of Substitution in the Accrual System
Are assets derived from an inheritance remain excluded from matrimonial claims?
- Wildeno Offers Insights
A key question in the application of the accrual system is whether assets derived from an inheritance remain excluded from matrimonial claims.
Sections 4 and 5 of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 provide clear guidance in this regard. The Act states that an inheritance, legacy, or donation received by a spouse during the subsistence of a marriage does not form part of that spouse’s accrual.
Importantly, this exclusion also extends to any asset acquired “by virtue of possession or former possession” of such inheritance, legacy, or donation, unless the spouses agree otherwise in their antenuptial contract or the testator or donor stipulates otherwise.
What Qualifies as Excluded Property?
This provision gives rise to what is commonly referred to as the principle of substitution.
In essence, this principle operates as a protective mechanism: where an excluded asset produces or is converted into another asset, the replacement asset may also remain excluded from the accrual.
For example, where a spouse inherits R1 million and utilises those funds to purchase immovable property, that property may also be excluded from the accrual calculation, despite being acquired during the marriage.
- However, this protection is not absolute.
In B F v R F (2017/5018A) [2018] ZAGPJHC 699, the court confirmed that, for substitution to apply, there must be a clear and demonstrable nexus between the original excluded asset and the newly acquired asset. The court emphasised that the spouse claiming the exclusion bears the onus of proving that the new asset is indeed the “progeny” of the original inheritance.
The Burden of Proof and Tracing Requirement
Accordingly, it is not sufficient to merely assert that an asset was acquired using inherited funds.
The claimant must provide adequate evidence to trace the inheritance into the new asset.
Where funds have been mixed, or where the link between the inheritance and the acquired asset cannot be clearly established, a court may find that the asset forms part of the spouse’s estate and is therefore subject to an accrual claim.
Conditional Protection of Substituted Assets
In conclusion, while the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 does extend protection to assets acquired through inheritance by way of substitution, such protection is conditional.
It depends on the ability to prove a direct and traceable connection between the original excluded asset and its replacement.
- Are you feeling...?
From administrative overwhelm to absolute peace of mind.
- Overwhelmed by SARS and Master’s Office requirements?
- Confused by incomplete documentation or family conflict?
- Worried about protecting your children’s inheritance?